Saturday 26 December 2015

Sketchbooks...

Comparing my use of sketchbooks to practising illustrators...

Similarly to Scott Garrett, I use Daler Rowney and Moleskine A6 hardback sketchbooks. I use these quite preciously; every page is a finished drawing. I find them really useful when I know exactly what I want to draw and how I want it to look. However there are plenty of reasons why I like these sketchbooks: They’re small so I can take them with me when I go out, they’ve got loads of pages in them so they take a while for me to fill them up and I find it really satisfying to flick through a thick sketchbook of finished drawings.

Scott Garret

Scott Garrett


My sketchbooks
                                       

My sketchbooks


I also recently started using A5 paperback sketchbooks by Seawhite. These I find very liberating as they just feel much more disposable and although I keep them all, I have no problem with making mistakes or filling pages with scribbles and pen/paint tests etc. I use these sketchbooks for preliminary sketches and designing textures which I then scan in. I suppose the way I use these sketchbooks is similar to Tim Marrs’ sketchbooks we looked through. Some pages are seemingly full of indecipherable nonsense whereas other pages feel quite substantial and could be used as finished pieces. I also use these sketchbooks when I’m studying something, for example, a double page spread of whales I did whilst studying them (view below).

Tim Marrs A3

Tim Marrs A3


My sketchbook

My sketchbook

Ink tests. 
Messed up but didn't rip it out. 
Just turned the page and tried again.

Whale study and notes.



In future I’m going to challenge myself to use bigger sketchbooks like A3 as I always work small and I liked how Tim Marrs had lots of elements on each page in his A3 books. I think I will find it very overwhelming to begin with but I would like to give it a go. 

Below are just more from my sketchbooks...


Animation: http://charlotteroseillustration.blogspot.co.uk/p/gifs.html






















Becca Stadtlander...

Becca Stadtlander

Astrological map, 2007


There are many reasons I love Becca Stadtlander’s work and particularly this image. I chose this image because I find it enchanting. The circular image on a square white background gives enough blank space to frame it but not too much that it’s distracting. The patchy dark blue background not only gives it depth but also looks like we’re looking into space. I also like how the uneven edge of the circle gives it a more handmade look and hasn't been tampered with too much.


Although this illustration doesn't tackle any new ideas or have a deep contextual background, which I am usually more drawn to, and is perhaps more just a pretty representation of an idea that’s been around since at least 1000BC, I think the detailed illustrations of each zodiac sign demonstrates human imagination and the mysteries of space. As I mentioned before, the blue background makes it look like we’re watching these constellations in the night sky and seeing all these ghostly figures dancing around above our heads. It reminds me of being a child and watching the stars or making images out of the clouds

This illustration although sold as a print, could actually be used in an educational way as all the constellations are accurate.


To make this image Becca Stadtlander has used Gouache paint on watercolour paper which is how the light on dark has been achieved and a faint texture from the paper has been retained. 


Artist Websites...

Taking a look at artist websites and general online presence...

Seeing the difference between Tim Marrs’ first and second website, I can see how important it is to know exactly how you want to come across to people. I also think that as appearance is a very personal thing and very important for artists, it is probably best done by the artist themselves, such as Tim Marrs has done the second time around and with companies such as Squarespace, there’s no reason why it can’t be as effective as paying someone to build your website for you. Marrs’ old website had a black background with a tiled gallery format. The combination of the black background with the multiple, high contrast, busy images over the top made it very uneasy to focus on any particular image. Initially my thought was ‘maybe just having one image on screen at a time, on a white background would make this website better’. However seeing the new website with a white background still with the tiled gallery format, I can see that the white breaks up the images enough that I am not distracted and can focus on each individual image. This to me shows how important it is to think through every aspect of your online appearance. I also like a feature he has used where hovering over each image tells you a bit more about the picture so you don't have to click on every image to find out more about it. As branding, Tim uses a logo which appears on his website, twitter, business card etc. 





Scott Garrett’s website is a true reflection of the personality of his work. The handwritten title reflects the friendly nature of his illustrations. Garrett uses cute names to differentiate between his pages: GarrettWorld is his website, GarrettWare the pottery shop, GarrettWear the t-shirt shop and GarrettLife his blog title. Gary Neill’s website is also a reflection of the way in which he works. The website is clear, simple and very professional looking, using an existing font as the title. Each page title is straight forward and links to social media are instantly visible. The tagline used in the title 'strong simple ideas' lets you know what kind of illustrator he is, from this you would assume his work is conceptual and bold, which it is. Putting myself in the position of a journalist, I could write an article, come to this website, see a flash of images getting a clear idea of the style, see the tagline and see the phone number all within seconds of entering the website.  







Martin O’Neill chose to call his website ‘cut it out’ rather than his actual name (which is present on the homepage of his website). I wouldn't say this is better or worse than using your name as your title, it does make it memorable as it’s a play on phrase being appropriated to his use of collage. Then again, using your name makes it more direct and possibly easier to find you when someone searches for you. I like the icons on Martin’s website, each title has a cut out image loosely appropriate to the page and when you hover on them the real thing appears. To me this website shows time, thought and perfectionism; it’s easy to navigate, fun and memorable and all necessary information is given clearly. 




Mick Marston’s website ‘The futile vignette’ is completely different to all of the above. The homepage I find slightly overwhelming as it’s a tiled gallery of illustrations, all of which are very bold and bright similar to Tim Marrs’ first website. As you hover over certain images, bits of text (which is slightly difficult to read) appear and all contact information is at the bottom of the page, which takes a while to scroll down to.